Product Description
From the PUMA archive in 1971, this was originally the leather answer to the Clyde, but the distinctive look combined with the clean and simple design gave this shoe instant entry into the sneaker hall of fame. Lightly padded insole for added comfort. EVA midsole. Durable rubber outsole.
User Reviews
Page 1 of 2
Next
--
Summary: Looks nice but not comfortable
Review: I purchased this over a year ago and is my least favorite pair of Pumas I own. It looks very nice, but is not comfortable to walk around in and especially not suitable for basketball.
Things I like:
1.)Great looking pair of sneakers.
2.)Good quality
Things I don't like:
1.)Uncomfortable to wear for extraneous use. Needs better padding and cushioning.
2.)Low cut for basketball...but good for regular use.
There are better choices out there and I would suggest trying these on before you purchase them online. Not all pumas are comfortable.
Date: 2010-08-24
Rating: 3
--
Summary: Best Shoes on the Court and off for a good price!
Review: When I got these shoes I wasn't expecting a lot for how much I payed for them. But I got these shoes and they are the perfect go to for Fridays and Weekends to wear with jeans and a polo or whatever is your style. Bottom line great price and an excellent shoe. Would buy it again if I had to.
Date: 2009-11-07
Rating: 5
--
Summary: Great shoe but should have bought 1/2 size bigger!
Review: The shoes are great! Make sure to buy at least 1/2 size larger. I usually wear a 11 1/2 and bought a pair of 11 1/2's but they are very tight on my feet.
Date: 2009-09-12
Rating: 5
--
Summary: Good shoes but really narrow and about half a size small
Review: Maybe my feet are too wide but the pumas are really narrow. While they feel solid and I can play good tennis, ball in them they are a size smaller than the Adidas, Nike, Timberland that i bought at 10M. I think one of the earlier reviews mentioned the sizing issues.. I should have paid more attention
Date: 2009-08-03
Rating: 4
--
Summary: What you see is what you get
Review: Not much to be said... Nice classic look. quality is fine, no smudging or fraying anywhere, I dont think they are "seconds" or anything of the sort.
Date: 2009-07-12
Rating: 5